<?xml version="1.0" encoding=""?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intra-active blog &#187; Blogging as conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corrie.edublogs.org/category/blogging-as-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://corrie.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>Reflective synthesis on learning systems architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Plus ca change, plus c&#8217;est la meme chose?</title>
		<link>http://corrie.edublogs.org/2005/08/19/is-blogging-really-something-new/</link>
		<comments>http://corrie.edublogs.org/2005/08/19/is-blogging-really-something-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Corrie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging as conversation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corrie.edublogs.org/2005/08/19/is-blogging-really-something-new/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, Will Richardson did what I was trying to do, but better and more thoroughly.Not surprising, that. The bottom line is that trying to follow a conversation that&#8217;s split up liek this is darned hard to do. It&#8217;s brain-stretching.
The question I still have is, is this medium fundamentally any different? Is there something unique about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, <a title="http://www.weblogg-ed.com/2005/08/18#a3901" href="http://www.weblogg-ed.com/2005/08/18#a3901">Will Richardson</a> did what I was trying to do, but better and more thoroughly.Not surprising, that. The bottom line is that trying to follow a conversation that&#8217;s split up liek this is darned hard to do. It&#8217;s brain-stretching.</p>
<p>The question I still have is, is this medium <strong>fundamentally</strong> any different? Is there something unique about blogs as a communications medium &#8211; as opposed to email lists or threaded discussions or ham radio or town hall meetings &#8211; that engenders this kind of activity? And if it does, is the activity of blogging <strong>fundamentally </strong>any different from other kinds of reading-writing-feedback?</p>
<p><a title="http://careo.elearning.ubc.ca/weblogs/brian/archives/013625.html" href="http://careo.elearning.ubc.ca/weblogs/brian/archives/013625.html">Brian Lamb</a> and the commentors on his site make an important point about the digital divide. Those of us who blog are a tiny fraction of the Internet population. And many people just aren&#8217;t interested. Yet, anyway. There&#8217;s a fair amount of technology to be mastered, and a lot of instructors are still barely understanding email.</p>
<p>Technology does not change people&#8217;s needs. It changes the way they get their needs met. Kids today email and IM like crazy. When I was in school we talked on the phone or hung out in the tree-fort, and passed notes in class. Same thing, different tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://corrie.edublogs.org/2005/08/19/is-blogging-really-something-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
